Expressing Disappointment in English

Expressing Disappointment in English We try our best and hope that everyone gets along well. Unfortunately, thats not always the case and we need to express disappointment. We might be disappointed with other people, or with ourselves. At other times, we might want to express our view that something we expected didnt go as planned. For these situations, its important to keep in mind the use of register  when expressing our disappointment. In other words, who are we speaking to, what is the relationship, and how should you communicate with them? The phrases we use will be different depending on whether we are speaking with friends or at work. Use these phrases to express your disappointment in the appropriate way. Expressing Disappointment and Frustration with Yourself I wish I Past Simple Present Disappointments The use of I wish with the past simple to express something you are disappointed with at the present time. This is similar to the use of the unreal conditional  to express something imaginary. I wish I had a better job.I wish I had more time for my family.ï » ¿I wish I spoke Italian. I wish I Past Perfect Regrets about the Past The use of I wish with the past perfect  is used to express regret over something that happened in the past. This is similar to the use of the unreal past conditional to express a different result in the past. I wish I had been hired for that job.I wish I had worked harder in school.I wish I had saved more money when I was young. If only I Past Simple Present Disappointments This form is used to express things we arent happy about at the present. It is similar to the form above. If only I played soccer well.If only I understood math.If only I had a faster car. If only I Past Perfect Regrets about the Past This form is used to express things regret about past experiences. It is similar to wish past perfect. If only I had moved to this city earlier.If only I had asked her to marry me.If only I had known about that last year! These forms can also be used to express disappointment with others: I wish she had paid better attention in class.I wish they asked me more questions. Im sure I could be of more help.If only they worked with us! We would give them a better deal than Smith and Co.If only Peter had hired Tom. He was much better qualified for the job. Expressing Disappointment with Others Why didnt S Verb? Why didnt you tell me that?!Why didnt he inform me of the situation?Why didnt they finish on time? How am/was I supposed to Verb How am I supposed to complete the project?How was I supposed to know that?!How am I supposed to work with this? Formal Expressions For Disappointment What a shame!Thats too bad.Thats so disappointing!I was so looking forward to ...I / We had high hopes for ...What we had been led to expect was ... Informal Expressions For Disappointment What a bummer!What a let-down!That stinks. Role Play Exercise: Between Friends Friend 1: Im not happy.Friend 2: Whats wrong?Friend 1: Oh, I didnt get that job.Friend 2: What a bummer!Friend 1: Yeah, I wish I had prepared better for the interview.Friend 2: Maybe you were just nervous.Friend 1: If I had only thought about how my experience applied to the position.Friend 2: That stinks. Well, Im sure youll do better next time.Friend 1: I hope so. Im sick of this job.Friend 2: Every job has its ups and downs.Friend 1: Isnt that the truth!Friend 2: Lets have a beer.Friend 1: Thats something that never disappoints.Friend 2: Youre right about that. Role Play Exercise: At the Office Colleague 1: Excuse me, Peter. Could I talk to you for a moment?Colleague 2: Sure, what can I do for you?Colleague 1: Why didnt you inform me of the situation with Andrew Ltd.?Colleague 2: Im sorry about that. I thought I had the situation under control.Colleague 1: You know I had high hopes for this account.Colleague 2: Yes, I know and I apologize that it didnt work out.  Colleague 1: Yes, well, how were you supposed to know they would try to change everything in the contract.Colleague 2: If only they had given us more time to come up with a different solution.Colleague 1: OK. Well, please make sure to keep me in the loop on future situations like this.Colleague 2: Certainly, Ill be more proactive next time this happens.  Colleague 1: Thank you, Peter.Colleague 2: Of course.

buy custom Archaic Homo Sapiens essay

buy custom Archaic Homo Sapiens essay The authors explore the cultural and social life of earlier members of the genus Homo, which include the archaic Homo sapiens. According to the authors, the archaic Homo sapiens were more environmentally adapted than their predecessors were. This is because they were able to make tools for use in various activities, which ranged from hunting, fishing, to self-defense. Tools found by archeologists that belonged to the archaic Homo sapiens indicate that they were advanced than those tools used by their predecessors. The authors explain that many of the tools that belonged to the archaic Homo sapiens resembled a lot with tools that were used in earlier industries by the current Homo sapiens. These tools date between 40,000 and 125, 000 years ago. Some of these tools include borer, hand axe, scraper, and knives, among others. Each tool had a different shape and size. Moreover, each tool had a specific purpose. For instance, the archaic Homo sapiens used knives to skin animals after hunti ng them, while the hand axe was used to break complex pieces of meat and bones from animals. Many of their tools were made of stones. However, the authors indicate that some tools were made of bones from animals. The resource is very useful in understanding more about the tools used by the archaic Homo sapiens because the authors provide some images of these tools. These images enable the reader to understand more about the different shapes, sizes, and forms of tools used by the predecessor of the modern human. In fact, to enable the reader understand the link between archaic Homo sapiens and the modern humans, the authors compare some of the tools belonging to the archaic Homo sapiens and those used by early surgeons. Just like the early Homo sapiens, the early surgeons used scalpels and blades made of stones from naturally occurring volcanic. They also used wood to make handles for their surgical tools and pine resin to join the handles to the tools. The authors also provide image s comparing the early surgeons tools with those used by the archaic Homo sapiens. The book is very insightful not only in providing a description of the features present in tools used by the archaic Homo sapiens, but also by providing images of some of the tools, with a clear view of the features present in these tools. In this book, the authors start by giving an account of cultural practices of the Homo sapiens. Just like Haviland et. al (2010), the authors in this resource acknowledge that the different types of archaic Homo sapiens were superior than their predecessors in terms of adaptation to the environment. The authors state that the Neanderthal man and the Homo sapiens sapiens were some of the different forms of archaic Homo sapiens. They state that these two categories of archaic Homo sapiens made and used tools of much greater efficiency and sophistication than all other prior species. For instance, the Neaderthals could make blades measuring around 40 inches from stones. The Homo sapiens sapiens could make blades measuring between 10 and 40 inches from stones as well. The authors of this resource agree with the previous authors that the archaic Homo sapiens made and used various tools for different purposes. Some of the tools mentioned by these authors include stone blades, scrapers, chi sel-like tools, arrows, and needles. Some of the uses of these tools as indicated by the authors include hunting, skinning animals, scraping and smoothing animal skins, and digging. Another similarity of these authors work and that of the previous authors is that the archaic Homo sapiens tools resembled a lot with tools used in early industries. These similarities include using wooden handles and the use of animal bones to make sharp-edged tools. In this book, the authors explore the Mousterian tradition of the archaic Homo sapiens. The authors use the word Mousterian to refer to the tool-making behavior of the archaic Homo sapiens. Similar to Serena Warms (2010) observation, the Neanderthal man belonged to one of the forms of archaic Homo sapiens. They state that tools made by the Neanderthal man were lighter and smaller than those made by earlier human species were. The authors also indicate that the Neanderthals also used advanced technology to make their tools. Unlike their predecessors who would make two or three flakes from an entire stone, the Neanderthals would make several smaller flakes from one stone. In addition, their flakes were sharper and smoother than those made their ancestors. This resource provides more information about the tool-making behavior of the archaic Homo sapiens. This is because the authors introduce new information, which is not present in the previous sources. The authors state that the Neand erthals had a wider variety of tools in their tool kit. These included flakes, hand axes, borers, and spears. They could use flakes to shave wood, which they would then use to make shafts for attaching to spears and other hand-held tools. The authors also point out that this variety of tools facilitated more effective use of food resources and enhanced the quality of clothing and shelter. This information enlightens us that the archaic Homo sapiens used tools to make cloths and shelter. The author of this resource focuses on the evolution of the early man, whose origin was traced in African countries. The author states that around 150,000 years ago, a major climate change took place in the world. During this period, the early Homo sapiens who lived in African regions were forced to migrate to other place of the world. Some headed towards Europe while others headed towards Asia. As they migrated, they had to close open water and Arctic regions. Due to exposure to different climatic conditions, they had to develop new techniques of making theiir tools. Their tool-making technique was improved compared to that of their ancestors back in the African regions. The author states that the archaic Homo sapiens were the first inventors of the blade. The blade was later adapted across Europe and Asia by the early ancestors of the modern human. Similar to other authors, the author of this resource points that the blades used by the archaic Homo sapiens were lighter, smaller, an d sharper than those used by prior species were. In addition, the author refers to the tool-making tradition of the archaic Homo sapiens as Mousterian tradition. This is similar to the previous resource by Castro et al. (1997). The author also provides images of various tools as well as images demonstrating the various techniques used by the Mousterian toolmakers to make refined blades. These images help the reader to understand the various tool-making technologies used by the archaic Homo sapiens. The author introduces a different tool, which is said to have been used by the archaic Homo sapiens during the Upper Paleolithic period. This is the spear-thrower (atlatl). The spear-thrower was a wooden device, between 1 and 2 feet long, with a hook at one edge, a stone at the middle, and a handle at the other edge. Hunter used the spear-thrower to through spears to wild animals from a distant location. This resource forms a good basis of the research because it enables the researcher to understand the various forms of technologies used by the archaic Homo sapiens and introduces new tools, which have not been mentioned in previous resources. In this resource, the author states that around 100,000 years ago, the human population spread into separate regions due to the disruption by the climatic changes that were taking place. There was a lot of volcanic eruption, which took place in many parts of Africa, which was the dominant habitant of the early human. The volcanic activities did not provide favorable survival environment to the early humans. Thus, they started moving to other parts of the world. Since they were separated from each other, they had to develop better methods of survival. This is when the archaic Homo sapiens are said to have developed new technology for making tools. Findings from this resource are similar to those of Castro et al. (1997) concerning development of advanced technology of manufacturing tools to develop cloths and shelter. The author states that the early humans from the archaic Homo sapiens generation, used scrapers to smoothen animal skins, which they used to cover themselves since they w ere exposed to cold climatic condition in their new habitants in Europe and Asia. In addition, they used hand axes to cut pieces of wood, which they used to make shelter. Therefore, this resource is important in providing more information concerning the archaic Homo sapienss tool-making behavior, and its connection with improving survival techniques of the archaic Homo sapiens. Buy custom Archaic Homo Sapiens essay

Deception by the Investigating Officer Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Deception by the Investigating Officer - Essay Example The essay "Deception by the Investigating Officer" talks about the deception and analyzes its concept as applied by investigating officers, detection of deception, the ethical issues surrounding this deception as well as the reasons for and against the application of this form of deception. In the criminal justice system, legal officers perform various tasks to ensure that there is the maintenance of law and order and criminals receive the punishment that they deserve. In this regard, investigating officers, charged with the responsibility of investigating suspects through interrogation and other means, have a very critical role to play in revealing the truth. In their pursuit of disclosing the truth, the criminal justice allows these officers to apply deception in investigative, interrogative and testimonial processes in order to disclose the truth. However, there are serious ethical issues surrounding this aspect of deception. As a result, there is often a conflict between the ethical standards of the society and implementation of laws. The police-induced confessions have influential and moving consequences on the nature of cases and on the entire criminal justice system making them a strong prosecutorial weapon. Definitely, the interrogations by modern police are at times so powerful that they have drawn out coerced compliant and identify false confessions from innocent people. According to researchers, the basis of interrogation is the presumption of guilt making the process too persuasive.